NHS Tameside and Glossop CCG v CR [2021] EWCOP 19

Coronavirus vaccination CR lacked capacity in relation to the coronavirus vaccination and it was not possible to determine his wishes and feelings. The Court of Protection decided it was in his best interests to have the vaccination, based on the orthodox view of its benefits, and rejecting family members' objections. The relief sought by the CCG was granted, although physical intervention was not authorised.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

• 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 112, March 2021)
• 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 119, February 2022)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

• Coronavirus cases🔍
• Coronavirus vaccination cases🔍

Date: 12/3/21🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

• Butler🔍

Parties:

• NHS Tameside and Glossop CCG🔍
• CR🔍
• SR🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2021] EWCOP 19^B

What links here:

• Mental capacity and coronavirus
• Alex Ruck Keene et al, 'Mental Capacity Report - End of term update' (39 Essex Chambers, 1/4/21)

Published: 11/4/21 22:41

Cached: 2024-12-19 09:41:38