View source for Re FL; HN v FL and Hampshire CC (2011) EWHC 2894 (COP)

'The primary issues requiring determination by the court were as follows: (1) FL’s capacity to make personal welfare decisions; (2) FL’s mental health needs; (3) FL’s medication; (4) The Z Home’s ability to meet FL’s physical and mental health needs; (5) Whether HN had conducted herself inappropriately or whether such conduct was justified; (6) Whether HCC and or The Z Home conducted themselves inappropriately or whether such conduct was justified; (7) Depending on the outcome of (5) and (6) whether restrictive orders should be made.' 'IPL were permitted to publish details about the case subject to the restrictions in that order.'

==Other==
Hearing: 27th to 30th September 2011

Before: DJ Ralton

The Applicant appeared in person

Ms Scott Counsel for the First Respondent (on 30th September 2011 only)

Ms Butler-Cole Counsel for the Second Respondent

==Thanks==
{{thanks|Batey, James|Court of Protection|providing transcript}}

==External links==
{{#bailii:(2011) EWHC 2894 (COP)|no}}

[[Media:Re FL; HN v FL and Hampshire CC (2011) EWHC 2894 (COP).pdf|Transcript]]

[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/womans-plea-for-more-access-to-disabled-sister-rejected-by-judge-2363987.html Terri Judd, 'Woman's plea for more access to disabled sister rejected by judge' (Independent, 1/10/11)]

[[Category:Best interests]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]