Welsh Ministers v PJ [2018] UKSC 66

(1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.

External links

Official press summary†

Supreme Court case details page†

• Watch hearing: 22/10/18 morning session
• Watch hearing: 22/10/18 afternoon session
• Watch judgment summary 17/12/18

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII^!

Subject(s):

• Deprivation of liberty🔍
• Powers🔍

Date: 17/12/18🔍

Court: Supreme Court🔍

Judge(s):

• Hale🔍
• Kerr🔍
• Wilson🔍
• Black🔍
• Lloyd-Jones🔍

Parties:

• Welsh Ministers🔍
• PJ🔍

Judicial history:

MM case:

• SSJ v MM [2018] UKSC 60
  • SSJ v MM; Welsh Ministers v PJ [2017] EWCA Civ 194, [2017] MHLO 16 (joint judgment)
    • MM v WL Clinic [2016] UKUT 37 (AAC), [2016] MHLO 3 (permission to appeal refused)
    • MM v WL Clinic [2015] UKUT 644 (AAC), [2015] MHLO 103

PJ case:

• Welsh Ministers v PJ [2018] UKSC 66
  • SSJ v MM; Welsh Ministers v PJ [2017] EWCA Civ 194, [2017] MHLO 16 (joint judgment)
    • PJ v A Local Health Board [2015] UKUT 480 (AAC), [2015] MHLO 63

Citation number(s):

• [2018] UKSC 66^!
• [2019] 2 WLR 82^{Not on Bailii!}

What links here:

• December 2018 chronology
• December 2018 update
• MM v WL Clinic [2015] UKUT 644 (AAC), [2015] MHLO 103
• Mental health case law
• PJ v A Local Health Board [2015] UKUT 480 (AAC), [2015] MHLO 63

Published: 17/12/18

Cached: 2019-07-19 07:29:37