Display title | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 25, September 2012) |
Default sort key | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 25, September 2012) |
Page length (in bytes) | 756 |
Page ID | 13298 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 19:35, 24 June 2021 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 22:10, 19 March 2023 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The cases mentioned in this issue are: Re MW; LB Hammersmith and Fulham v MW (2012) MHLO 82 (COP) — Re CA (A Baby); Coventry City Council v C (2012) EWHC 2190 (Fam), (2012) MHLO 110 — Davis v West Sussex County Council (2012) EWHC 2152 (QB), (2012) MHLO 83 — Further information is given under the following headings: Funding; MCA literature review; Consultation on new safeguarding power. |