| Display title | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 86, June 2018) |
| Default sort key | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 86, June 2018) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,122 |
| Page ID | 13061 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 07:41, 3 May 2021 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 23:03, 19 March 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "Highlights this month include: (1) In the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Report: a rare appellate level decision considering best interests (and confirming that they should be rare); (2) In the Property and Affairs Report: (partially) endorsing an attorney’s actions after the event; (3) In the Practice and Procedure Report: choosing litigation friends; (4) In the Wider Context Report: the National Mental Capacity Forum reports, and an important Strasbourg re-cap of the principles applying to capacity; (5) In the Scotland Report: a new Public Guardian and the MWC is cautious about attorneys consenting to restrictions on liberty." |