O v P [2024] EWCA Civ 1577

Revision as of 21:25, 14 February 2025 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2024-12-19 |NCN=[2024] EWCA Civ 1577 |Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |Judges=Vos, McFarlane, King |Parties=O, P, Q |Judicial history=*O v P (2024) EWCA Civ 1577 *O v P (2024) EWHC 1077 (Fam) |Sentence=Gender dysphoria |Summary=The High Court had dismissed proceedings rather than adjourn because it could not see any realistic basis for overriding the 16-year-old's consent for cross-sex hormones. The Court of Appeal reversed that decision beca...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)
Gender dysphoria The High Court had dismissed proceedings rather than adjourn because it could not see any realistic basis for overriding the 16-year-old's consent for cross-sex hormones. The Court of Appeal reversed that decision because: (1) Gender Plus, a private provider, could not satisfy all the Cass Review recommendations, including that every medical treatment case be considered by a national MDT; (2) the Cass Review had only just been published when the judge heard the application, and there was sufficient doubt as to what is proper and appropriate in this area.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 19/12/24πŸ”

Court: Court of Appeal (Civil Division)πŸ”

Judicial history:

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 14/2/25 21:25

Cached: 2025-04-18 02:37:49