Flag of England.gif

Re KC: LCR v SC [2020] EWCOP 62

Revision as of 11:55, 8 October 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)
Whether to register LPAs (1) The three-stage test in Re J (2010) MHLO 167 (COP) for revocation of an LPA was applied to LPA registration in this case: the LPAs were not registered as the acrimonious relationship among the donees would prevent them from acting in KC's best interests. (2) a panel deputy for property and affairs was appointed, but no personal welfare deputy.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 29/9/20πŸ”

Court: Court of ProtectionπŸ”

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 12/12/20 10:59

Cached: 2025-04-25 08:23:50