Flag of England.gif

R (F and Thompson) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 17

Revision as of 11:15, 25 April 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The notification requirements in Part 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (the Sex Offenders Register) constitute a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights because they make no provision for individual review of the requirements.

Related judgments

R (F and Thompson) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 17

External link

BAILII

Press release on Supreme Court website

Oral ministerial statement, 'Statement on sex offenders' register' (16/2/11) - In response to the Supreme Court decision, the police will be given the power to remove a sex offender from the register; there will be no right of appeal.