Flag of England.gif

R (KM) v Cambridgeshire CC [2011] EWCA Civ 682

Revision as of 23:41, 30 October 2016 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(1) The assessment of needs was adequate. (2) There has to be a rational link between the needs and the assessed direct payments, but there does not need to be a finite absolute mathematical link, so the use of the Resource Allocation System (RAS) was lawful. (3) The explanation of the personal budget figure was rational.

Related judgments

R (KM) v Cambridgeshire CC [2012] UKSC 23, [2012] MHLO 57

External links

BAILII

Local Government Lawyer, 'Supreme Court decides not to review key 1997 community care resources ruling' (20/2/12)