Flag of England.gif

Re Black [2013] MHLO 20 (LPA)

Revision as of 23:46, 26 March 2013 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''The donor, a solicitor, appointed A and B as attorneys, to act jointly and severally. She imposed the following restriction: "A has been appointed solely to manage ABC Solic...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The donor, a solicitor, appointed A and B as attorneys, to act jointly and severally. She imposed the following restriction: "A has been appointed solely to manage ABC Solicitors to enable continuing management of the Practice. B has been appointed to deal with all other financial matters both personal and business related, which do not specifically require a Solicitor of the Supreme Court." On the application of the Public Guardian the restriction was severed because it was incompatible with a joint and several appointment. [OPG summary - LPA case.]

Note

Summary from OPG section of Justice website.

Case title: Re Black (an order of the Senior Judge made on 11 January 2013)

Listed under heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with a Property and Financial Affairs LPA

External link

Not on Bailii - no transcript

Summary on OPG section of Justice website . This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).