Flag of England.gif

R v Orchard [2010] EWCA Crim 1538

Revision as of 17:30, 10 July 2010 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with '''The concurrent sentences of two years' imprisonment were appealed on the basis that (i) they were at the top end of the sentencing guidelines bracket and (2) the learned judge …')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The concurrent sentences of two years' imprisonment were appealed on the basis that (i) they were at the top end of the sentencing guidelines bracket and (2) the learned judge did not take sufficient account of the circumstances of the offence, namely that the appellant was at the material time a psychiatric patient. The sentences were reduced to 18 months' imprisonment.

External link

...