Re F [2009] EWHC B30 (Fam)

Revision as of 22:46, 16 August 2009 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with '''The "gateway" test for the engagement of the court’s powers under s48 (Interim orders and directions) must be lower than that of evidence sufficient, in itse...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The "gateway" test for the engagement of the court’s powers under s48 (Interim orders and directions) must be lower than that of evidence sufficient, in itself, to rebut the presumption of capacity. The proper test in the first instance is whether there is evidence giving good cause for concern that P may lack capacity in some relevant regard. Once that is raised as a serious possibility, the court then moves on to the second stage to decide what action, if any, it is in P's best interests to take before a final determination of his capacity can be made.

Other

Hearing: 28 May 2009

Judgment: 26 June 2009

Before: HHJ Marshall QC

Mr Stephen Cragg (instructed by Irwin Mitchell Solicitors) for the Appellant

No other party appeared on the appeal

External link

Not on Bailii at time of writing. Neutral citation unknown.

Transcript, courtesy of Miles & Partners