R v Hendy [2006] EWCA Crim 819

Revision as of 14:01, 17 January 2009 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (New page: ''The conviction for murder was quashed and replaced with diminished responsibility manslaughter because the judge's direction on the effect of alcohol reflected the law as then (erroneous...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The conviction for murder was quashed and replaced with diminished responsibility manslaughter because the judge's direction on the effect of alcohol reflected the law as then (erroneously) understood but was wrong in light of a later House of Lords case; obiter, fresh medical evidence relating to the diagnosis of personality disorder might reasonably have affected the decision of the jury. A retrial was not appropriate as tariff had been served; a restricted hospital order would be substituted for the life sentence.

Note

The House of Lords case referred to is R v Dietschmann [2003] UKHL 10.

Other

Hearing date: 23 March 2006

Before: Gage LJ, Forbes J, Dame Heather Steel

Ian Pringle QC and Christopher Quinlan for the Crown

Peter Thornton QC and Paul Taylor for Hendy

External link

This case on Bailii

R v Dietchmann on Bailii