Re Black (2013) MHLO 20 (LPA): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:severance of restrictions" to "Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:LPA cases - all" to "") |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{lpa-summary-link}} | {{lpa-summary-link}} | ||
[[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | [[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2013 cases]] | [[Category:2013 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:59, 2 May 2021
The donor, a solicitor, appointed A and B as attorneys, to act jointly and severally. She imposed the following restriction: "A has been appointed solely to manage ABC Solicitors to enable continuing management of the Practice. B has been appointed to deal with all other financial matters both personal and business related, which do not specifically require a Solicitor of the Supreme Court." On the application of the Public Guardian the restriction was severed because it was incompatible with a joint and several appointment. [OPG summary - LPA case.]
Note
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.
Case title: Re Black (an order of the Senior Judge made on 11 January 2013)
Listed under heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with a Property and Financial Affairs LPA
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website . This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).