Re Vallet (2009) COP 27/1/09: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Category:EPA cases - all" to "") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:EPA cases - formalities]] | [[Category:EPA cases - formalities]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 1 May 2021
The original EPA could not be produced, nor was there a certified copy in existence. Regulation 24(2) of the Lasting Powers of Attorney, Enduring Powers of Attorney and Public Guardian Regulations 2007 provides that, in such a case, the Public Guardian must not register without an order of the court. On the application of the attorney the court declared that it was satisfied that the copy was a copy of the original EPA, which had been lost but not revoked, and directed registration. [OPG summary - EPA case.]
Note
The summary above is taken from the OPG website. It is listed under the heading "Registration of uncertified copy " as "Re Vallet (an order of District Judge S E Rogers made on 27 January 2009)".
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website .This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).