Pender v DPP (2013) EWHC 2598 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Jonathan moved page Pender v DPP (2013) MHLO 12 (QBD) to Pender v DPP (2013) EWHC 2598 (Admin)) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 22:56, 18 May 2020
An ASBO was imposed with a 'no begging' condition. A Crown Court appeal, based on uncontradicted medical evidence (that the appellant suffered learning difficulties, schizophrenia and severe nicotine addiction, and that begging was the manifestation of nicotine addiction), was unsuccessful. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by way of case stated, because the judge had failed to set out the factual basis for her factual conclusion (which was contrary to the medical evidence) that the appellant had been capable of complying with the ASBO.
Citations
(2013) 177 CL&J 78, [2013] All ER (D) 173 (Jan)
Was on MHLO as [2013] MHLO 12 (QBD) before NCN known
External link
No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: