R (C) v SSJ (2014) EWCA Civ 1009: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''The press has reported this case as follows: A restricted transferred prisoner patient in medium security judicially reviewed the Secretary of State's refusal to grant permi...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''The press has reported this case as follows: | ''The press has reported this case as follows: a restricted transferred prisoner patient in medium security judicially reviewed the Secretary of State's refusal to grant permission for unescorted community leave; Cranston J refused to make an anonymity order, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal (Lord Dyson MR; Maurice Kay LJ, VP; Floyd LJ). It is understood that an appeal will be made to the Supreme Court. | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 8 February 2015
The press has reported this case as follows: a restricted transferred prisoner patient in medium security judicially reviewed the Secretary of State's refusal to grant permission for unescorted community leave; Cranston J refused to make an anonymity order, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal (Lord Dyson MR; Maurice Kay LJ, VP; Floyd LJ). It is understood that an appeal will be made to the Supreme Court.
External link
...
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: