Open justice | Let us know if you have a tribunal decision you would like to publish (see Re A)
Email updates | CPD scheme

Online forum | Latest topic on forum: S.117 & "incapacity" | News

Poole Borough Council (06/B/7542) (2007) MHLO 2 (LGO): Difference between revisions
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Duties under [[s117]].
{{Case
 
|Date=2007-09-05
==Report Summary (from report itself)==
|Court=Local Government Ombudsman
 
|Parties=Bournemouth and Poole Primary Care Trust, Poole Borough Council
|Sentence=Wrongful discharge from s117
|Summary=The council decided to discharge the patient from s117 when her husband/carer had a stroke and she had to move to a nursing home, simply because "the change of circumstance had come about as a result of the illness of her carer rather than her mental health needs". There was no assessment of her mental health needs and no multi-disciplinary meeting (despite the council's claims to the contrary). In the absence of a proper discharge process, the Council’s s117 funding responsibilities continued. The Ombudsman recommended that the council compensate the patient's son for the £33,455.58 care home fees.
|Detail===Report Summary (from report itself)==
<div class="perm">
===Facts===
===Facts===
Mr B Arnold, not his real name, complained that the Council failed to discharge a section 117 order properly in December 2000 in respect of his late mother, Mrs D Arnold.  The Ombudsman found that the Council failed to carry out a proper assessment of her mental health needs to establish that section 117 aftercare was no longer required.  It also failed to hold a multi-disciplinary meeting, in accordance with the Code of Practice, with the relevant  professionals, the patient and her carer or nearest relative to review the care plan. As a result of these failures Mr Arnold had to bear the full cost of care for his mother until she died in April 2002, amounting to £33,455.58.
Mr B Arnold, not his real name, complained that the Council failed to discharge a section 117 order properly in December 2000 in respect of his late mother, Mrs D Arnold.  The Ombudsman found that the Council failed to carry out a proper assessment of her mental health needs to establish that section 117 aftercare was no longer required.  It also failed to hold a multi-disciplinary meeting, in accordance with the Code of Practice, with the relevant  professionals, the patient and her carer or nearest relative to review the care plan. As a result of these failures Mr Arnold had to bear the full cost of care for his mother until she died in April 2002, amounting to £33,455.58.
Line 13: Line 17:


The Ombudsman recommends that the Council compensates Mr Arnold for the cost of the nursing home fees for his mother from 17 December 2000 until 17 April 2002 (£33,455.58), plus interest at the relevant County Court rate.  
The Ombudsman recommends that the Council compensates Mr Arnold for the cost of the nursing home fees for his mother from 17 December 2000 until 17 April 2002 (£33,455.58), plus interest at the relevant County Court rate.  
 
</div>
==External links==
|External links=*[[Media:06b07542.doc|Original Word document]]
{{#bailii:no ncn}}
*[[Media(2007) MHLO 2 (LGO).pdf|PDF]]
 
|Subject=After-care
[[Media:06b07542.doc|Full report]] (not available on LGO website)
|Judgment=(2007) MHLO 2 (LGO).pdf
 
|News=No
[[Category:LGO decisions]]
|RSS pubdate=2025-3-8 11:04:09 PM
[[Category:Detailed summary]]
}}
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2007 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]

Latest revision as of 23:04, 8 March 2025

Wrongful discharge from s117 The council decided to discharge the patient from s117 when her husband/carer had a stroke and she had to move to a nursing home, simply because "the change of circumstance had come about as a result of the illness of her carer rather than her mental health needs". There was no assessment of her mental health needs and no multi-disciplinary meeting (despite the council's claims to the contrary). In the absence of a proper discharge process, the Council’s s117 funding responsibilities continued. The Ombudsman recommended that the council compensate the patient's son for the £33,455.58 care home fees.

Report Summary (from report itself)

Facts

Mr B Arnold, not his real name, complained that the Council failed to discharge a section 117 order properly in December 2000 in respect of his late mother, Mrs D Arnold. The Ombudsman found that the Council failed to carry out a proper assessment of her mental health needs to establish that section 117 aftercare was no longer required. It also failed to hold a multi-disciplinary meeting, in accordance with the Code of Practice, with the relevant professionals, the patient and her carer or nearest relative to review the care plan. As a result of these failures Mr Arnold had to bear the full cost of care for his mother until she died in April 2002, amounting to £33,455.58.

Finding

Maladministration causing injustice.

Recommended Remedy

The Ombudsman recommends that the Council compensates Mr Arnold for the cost of the nursing home fees for his mother from 17 December 2000 until 17 April 2002 (£33,455.58), plus interest at the relevant County Court rate.


External links

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)
Download here

Subject(s):

Date: 5/9/07🔍

Court: Local Government Ombudsman🔍

Parties:

  • Bournemouth and Poole Primary Care Trust🔍
  • Poole Borough Council🔍

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 21/8/08 14:27

Cached: 2025-04-13 13:06:16

Retrieved from "https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Poole_Borough_Council_(06/B/7542)_(2007)_MHLO_2_(LGO)&oldid=65280"