SCC v FP (2022) EWCOP 30: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:53, 6 June 2023

Contact with mother "The challenging issue for the court to determine in this case is whether it is in the best interests of a vulnerable 36 year old woman, FP, who lacks capacity to make decisions about residence, care, and contact with others, to be deprived of direct contact with her mother, RT, with whom she wants to have contact, for a period of at least five months. RT’s behaviour forms the basis of the Local Authority’s application to prohibit contact with her daughter for a long interim period, and her behaviour as an unrepresented party made it very difficult to manage the hearing of the application before this court."

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Best interests🔍

Date: 30/6/22🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judicial history:

Judge(s):

Poole🔍

Parties:

SCC🔍
FP🔍
RT🔍
ST🔍

Citation number(s):

[2022] EWCOP 30^B

What links here:

Published: 6/6/23 20:52

Cached: 2025-04-25 07:33:50

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |Judges=Poole
 |Parties=SCC, FP, RT, ST
+|Judicial history=*[[SCC v FP (2022) EWCOP 30]]
+*[[Sunderland City Council v Macpherson (2023) EWCOP 3]]
 |Sentence=Contact with mother
 |Summary="The challenging issue for the court to determine in this case is whether it is in the best interests of a vulnerable 36 year old woman, FP, who lacks capacity to make decisions about residence, care, and contact with others, to be deprived of direct contact with her mother, RT, with whom she wants to have contact, for a period of at least five months. RT’s behaviour forms the basis of the Local Authority’s application to prohibit contact with her daughter for a long interim period, and her behaviour as an unrepresented party made it very difficult to manage the hearing of the application before this court."