R (C) v SSJ (2014) EWCA Civ 1009: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
{{bailii | {{#bailii:no tran}} | ||
{{link|http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/jul/16/murderer-not-entitled-remain-anonymous-seeking-rehabilitation|Guardian, 'Murderer not entitled to remain anonymous while seeking rehabilitation' (Press Association, 16/7/14)|s}} | {{link|http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/jul/16/murderer-not-entitled-remain-anonymous-seeking-rehabilitation|Guardian, 'Murderer not entitled to remain anonymous while seeking rehabilitation' (Press Association, 16/7/14)|s}} | ||
Revision as of 23:46, 30 October 2016
The press has reported this case as follows: a restricted transferred prisoner patient in medium security judicially reviewed the Secretary of State's refusal to grant permission for unescorted community leave; Cranston J refused to make an anonymity order, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal (Lord Dyson MR; Maurice Kay LJ, VP; Floyd LJ). It is understood that an appeal will be made to the Supreme Court.
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: