Roach v Home Office (2009) EWHC 312 (QB): Difference between revisions
(Created page with '''The costs of attending an inquest can in principle be recovered by way of costs in subsequent civil proceedings; the fact that the inquest work was covered by a public funding ...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Inquests]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 5 July 2009
The costs of attending an inquest can in principle be recovered by way of costs in subsequent civil proceedings; the fact that the inquest work was covered by a public funding certificate had no bearing on the recoverability of the costs.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: