R v Ansell (2023) EWCA Crim 1529: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{thanks|Keogh, Rossi|Crimeline}} | {{thanks|Keogh, Rossi|Crimeline}} | ||
|Subject=Sentence appeal cases | |Subject=Sentence appeal cases | ||
|Judgment= | |Judgment=(2023) EWCA Crim 1529.pdf | ||
|News=Yes | |News=Yes | ||
|RSS pubdate=2025-02-13 11:12:39 AM | |RSS pubdate=2025-02-13 11:12:39 AM | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 22:31, 9 March 2025
Appeal against life sentence The unrepresented appellant sought to appeal his life sentence, essentially on the basis that his mental health problems had not properly been addressed at trial, and sought an extension of time of over 20 years as "I did not know until now I could appeal under the Mental Health Act". He was unsuccessful: his mental health problems were known at the time, diminished responsibility had not been raised at trial, and he had been convicted of murder for which the only possible sentence is life.
Thanks
Thanks to Rossi Keogh (Crimeline) for providing the judgment.Full judgment: Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)
Download here
Subject(s):
- Sentence appeal cases🔍
Date: 31/10/23🔍
Court: Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)🔍
Judicial history:
- R v Ansell [2024] EWCA Crim 1669 (conviction)
- R v Ansell [2023] EWCA Crim 1529 (sentence)
Judge(s):
Parties:
- Glenn Ansell🔍
Citation number(s):
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1529Not on Bailii!
Published: 13/2/25 11:27
Cached: 2025-03-14 18:33:20
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: