Roach v Home Office (2009) EWHC 312 (QB): Difference between revisions
(Created page with '''The costs of attending an inquest can in principle be recovered by way of costs in subsequent civil proceedings; the fact that the inquest work was covered by a public funding ...') |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/(.*)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] EWHC $3 ($1)}}") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2009] EWHC 312 (QB)}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Inquest cases]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:39, 25 April 2021
The costs of attending an inquest can in principle be recovered by way of costs in subsequent civil proceedings; the fact that the inquest work was covered by a public funding certificate had no bearing on the recoverability of the costs.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: