Page values for "Re C (2020) MHLO 48 (FTT)"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2020-09-03 11:37:18 PM
_modificationDateDatetime2023-08-24 4:10:53 PM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2020/08/21 |Other citations=[2020] MHLO 48 (FTT) |Court=First-tier Tribunal |Judges=Birrell |Parties=C |Sentence=Remote pre-hearing examinations are practicable |Summary=(1) A salaried tribunal judge initially refused to allow a pre-hearing examination (PHE) because the coronavirus Pilo ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |2020_cases
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringRe C (2020) MHLO 48 (FTT)
_pageIDInteger10,958
_pageNamePageRe C (2020) MHLO 48 (FTT)
_pageTitleString

Re C [2020] MHLO 48 (FTT)

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"News" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
Which_tableStringCases
RSS_titleWikitext
RSS_descriptionWikitext
RSS_pubdateDatetime2020-09-03 10:22:50 PM

"Contributors" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
NameStringConroy, Ben
PlaceStringConroys Solicitors
ContributionStringproviding the decision

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

Remote pre-hearing examinations are practicable

SummaryWikitext

(1) A salaried tribunal judge initially refused to allow a pre-hearing examination (PHE) because the coronavirus Pilot Practice Direction states: "During the Covid-19 pandemic it will not be 'practicable' under rule 34 of the 2008 Rules for any PHE examinations to take place, due to the health risk such examinations present." (2) Having treated the rule 46 application for permission to appeal as a rule 6 challenge, a different salaried tribunal judge decided that: (a) the practice direction is subordinate to the rules and overriding objective; (b) in video-enabled hearings with a full panel a PHE is practicable by that means; (c) hearings and PHEs should be conducted remotely as, even if the hospital would allow access, the tribunal will not put its members at risk of contracting or spreading coronavirus; (d) in this case, the PHE would take place by video link on the morning of the hearing. [First-tier Tribunal decisions are not binding.]

DetailText==Thanks== Thanks to Ben Conroy (Conroys Solicitors) for providing the decision. ==Note== The Deputy Chamber President has asked for this statement to be published: "Permission has been granted by the First Tier Tribunal to publish this case on the MHLO website. This is not a reported judgement. The decision is only made in relation to this case and as a decision of the FTT, there is no obligation on any other FTT judge or panel to follow this." The practice direction referred to in the case is: [[Pilot Practice Direction: Health, Education and Social Care Chamber of the First-Tier Tribunal (Mental Health) (Coronavirus, 19/3/20)]]. The following were published after this case: *[[Mental Health Tribunal, 'Video Hearing Guidance for Representatives in Mental Health Tribunals' (11/9/20)]] *[[Amended Pilot Practice Direction: Health, Education and Social Care Chamber of the First-Tier Tribunal (Mental Health) (Coronavirus, 14/9/20)]]
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,Coronavirus cases First-tier Tribunal decisions Powers
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2020-08-21
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,Birrell
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,C
CourtStringFirst-tier Tribunal
NCNString
MHLRString
ICLRString
ICLR_IDString
EssexString
Essex_issueString
Essex_pageString
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,[2020] MHLO 48 (FTT)
CitesList of String, delimiter: #
External_linksText
JudgmentFile
(2020) MHLO 48 (FTT).pdf