Page values for "R v Ghulam (2009) EWCA Crim 2285"
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | 2009-10-24 8:54:16 AM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2021-04-25 11:19:49 AM |
| _creator | String | Jonathan |
| _fullText | Searchtext | ''Under [[CPIA 1964 s4]] the court must not make a determination that the defendant is unfit to plead without medical evidence from two medical practitioners; however, where the medical evidence of unfitness to plead is only available from one medical practitioner, the judge is not bound to adjourn ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | 2009 cases • Detailed summary • ICLR summary • Judgment available on Bailii • Transcript • Unfitness and insanity cases |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | R v Ghulam (2009) EWCA Crim 2285 |
| _pageID | Integer | 4,790 |
| _pageName | Page | R v Ghulam (2009) EWCA Crim 2285 |
| _pageTitle | String | R v Ghulam [2009] EWCA Crim 2285 |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |