Page values for "R (YZ) v NHS Trust (2015) EWHC 2296 (Admin)"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2015-08-01 9:09:36 PM
_modificationDateDatetime2021-10-08 11:54:11 AM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2015/07/31 |NCN=[2015] EWHC 2296 (Admin) |Other citations=[2015] MHLO 58 |Court=High Court (Administrative Court) |Judges=McGowan |Parties=YZ, NHS Trust 1, NHS Trust 2, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, West London Mental Health NHS Trust |Judicial history=*[[R (YZ) v Oxleas NHS Foundation T ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |2015 cases Cases Judgment available on Bailii Miscellaneous cases Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function Judgment_available_on_Bailii 2015_cases
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringR (YZ) v NHS Trust (2015) EWHC 2296 (Admin)
_pageIDInteger8,080
_pageNamePageR (YZ) v NHS Trust (2015) EWHC 2296 (Admin)
_pageTitleString

R (YZ) v NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 2296 (Admin)

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

Hospital transfer

SummaryWikitext

(1) YZ ceased to comply with clozapine treatment, and was referred by a medium secure unit (MSU) to Broadmoor hospital. After Broadmoor's Admission Panel decided that while off clozapine the risks justified a high secure setting, YZ became willing to restart clozapine but his new doctor at the MSU was unwilling to prescribe it. YZ appealed the Admission Panel decision and argued that new information meant the case should be reconsidered by the original panel, but Broadmoor decided there was no new information so the case was considered by the Admission Appeals Panel, which upheld the decision. (2) YZ's position was that he could restart clozapine in medium security, the relationship with staff at the MSU had broken down but he should be transferred to another MSU, and once treatment of his gender dysphoria commenced his mental state would probably improve. He argued that transfer to Broadmoor would breach the Code of Practice's least restriction principle and violate Articles 3 and 8. He sought judicial review of: (a) the decision not to prescribe clozapine; (b) the decision to transfer him to Broadmoor; (c) Broadmoor's decision to accept him; (d) the decision not to refer the case back to the original admissions panel. (3) Taking the grounds in turn, the court held that: (a) There was no clinician willing to prescribe clozapine, and the court "cannot and should not seek to decide what medical treatment is appropriate in these circumstances and declare an informed and justified decision unlawful". (b) The decision to transfer to Broadmoor was taken carefully and through the correct procedures, and no medium secure unit was willing to take the patient. (c) The decision to accept was a rational decision open to the admissions panel on the material before it. (d) The appeals panel decision was not susceptible to judicial review, and the process was rational and had not been challenged at the time. Permission was therefore refused.

DetailText
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,Miscellaneous cases
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2015-07-31
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,McGowan
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,YZ NHS Trust 1 NHS Trust 2 Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust West London Mental Health NHS Trust
CourtStringHigh Court (Administrative Court)
NCNString[2015] EWHC 2296 (Admin)
MHLRString
ICLRString
ICLR_IDString
EssexString
Essex_issueString
Essex_pageString
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,[2015] MHLO 58
CitesList of String, delimiter: #
External_linksText
JudgmentFile