Page values for "Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council v KZ (2024) EWCOP 72 (T3)"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2024-12-07 8:52:27 PM
_modificationDateDatetime2025-03-18 8:25:43 PM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2024-12-04 |NCN=[2024] EWCOP 72 (T3) |Essex issue=147 |Essex page=5 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Theis |Parties=Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council, KZ, RK, AC |Sentence=Anticipatory declarations under s16 - assessment of deaf people |Summary=(1) The court decided that it had powe ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringOldham Metropolitan Borough Council v KZ (2024) EWCOP 72 (T3)
_pageIDInteger16,055
_pageNamePageOldham Metropolitan Borough Council v KZ (2024) EWCOP 72 (T3)
_pageTitleString

Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council v KZ [2024] EWCOP 72 (T3)

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"News" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
Which_tableStringCases
RSS_titleWikitext
RSS_descriptionWikitext
RSS_pubdateDatetime2024-12-07 8:08:41 PM

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

Anticipatory declarations under s16 - assessment of deaf people

SummaryWikitext

(1) The court decided that it had power to make anticipatory declarations under MCA 2005 s16 (which in this case would render deprivation of liberty under s4A(4) lawful as being a decision of the court under s16(2)(a)). (2) The original psychiatric evidence was that KZ lacked capacity in all areas. A subsequent assessment by a psychologist with expertise in assessing deaf people found that, while he lacked capacity in relation to sex, finances, tenancy, social media and internet, and litigation, he did have capacity in relation to residence, care and support, and contact with his family (although that capacity fluctuated daily); and that he had extreme language deprivation rather than borderline learning disability. (3) The new evidence was accepted, and anticipatory declarations were made. (4) The judge provided guidance for assessment of a deaf individual fluent in BSL: it should be undertaken by an assessor who is suitably qualified to communicate at the relevant level of BSL and ideally with a background in understanding deafness and engaging with the deaf community; otherwise, explanations would be required.

DetailText
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,Other capacity cases
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2024-12-04
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,Theis
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council KZ RK AC
CourtStringCourt of Protection
NCNString[2024] EWCOP 72 (T3)
MHLRString
ICLRString
ICLR_IDString
EssexString
Essex_issueString147
Essex_pageString5
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,
CitesList of String, delimiter: #
External_linksText
JudgmentFile