1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | 2009-02-15 10:14:22 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2021-05-29 11:35:02 PM |
| _creator | String | Jonathan |
| _fullText | Searchtext | ''The nearest relative's statement to the AMHP that he disagreed with detention under s3 was sufficient to amount to the notification of an objection under s11; it was unaffected, in the absence of any clear evidence of a change of mind, by the failure to state an objection in a subsequent conversat ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | 2009 cases • Brief summary • Consulting NR • Judgment available on MHLO • Neutral citation unknown or not applicable • Transcript |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | M v East London NHS Foundation Trust CO/1065/2009 |
| _pageID | Integer | 4,329 |
| _pageName | Page | M v East London NHS Foundation Trust CO/1065/2009 |
| _pageTitle | String | M v East London NHS Foundation Trust CO/1065/2009
|
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| Name | String | Seligman, Matthew |
| Place | String | Campbell-Taylor Solicitors |
| Contribution | String | providing the judgment and writing a detailed summary |
