Page values for "Dunhill v Burgin (2011) EWHC 464 (QB)"
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | 2011-03-29 10:28:29 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2016-10-30 11:35:56 PM |
| _creator | String | Jonathan |
| _fullText | Searchtext | ''The claimant had settled a PI claim on unfavourable terms and now sought to have the consent order declared void for want of capacity; this judgment involves a consideration of litigation capacity. (1) In considering the issue of capacity historically, rather than prospectively, the court should c ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | 2011 cases • Brief summary • Judgment available on Bailii • Other capacity cases • Transcript |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Dunhill v Burgin (2011) EWHC 464 (QB) |
| _pageID | Integer | 5,737 |
| _pageName | Page | Dunhill v Burgin (2011) EWHC 464 (QB) |
| _pageTitle | String | Dunhill v Burgin [2011] EWHC 464 (QB) |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |