Page values for "AM (Afghanistan) v SSHD (2017) EWCA Civ 1123"
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | 2019-07-26 8:29:51 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | 2023-07-04 11:32:00 PM |
_creator | String | Jonathan |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{Case |Date=2017/07/27 |NCN=[2017] EWCA Civ 1123 |ICLR=[2017] WLR(D) 527 |Other citations=[2017] CP Rep 41, [2017] Imm AR 6, [2017] INLR 839, [2018] 2 All ER 350, [2017] Imm AR 1508, [2018] 4 WLR 78 |Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |Judges=Gross, Ernest Ryder, Underhill |Parties=AM (Afghanis ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | 2017 cases • Cases • ICLR summary • Judgment available on Bailii • Litigation friend cases • Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function • Repatriation cases • Judgment_available_on_Bailii • 2017_cases |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | AM (Afghanistan) v SSHD (2017) EWCA Civ 1123 |
_pageID | Integer | 10,257 |
_pageName | Page | AM (Afghanistan) v SSHD (2017) EWCA Civ 1123 |
_pageTitle | String | AM (Afghanistan) v SSHD [2017] EWCA Civ 1123 |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Cases" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Sentence | Wikitext | Immigration tribunal - fair hearing, litigation friends |
Summary | Wikitext | In this judgment the Court of Appeal gave guidance on the general approach to be adopted in FTT and UT immigration and asylum cases to the fair determination of claims for asylum from children, young people and other incapacitated or vulnerable persons whose ability to effectively participate in proceedings may be limited. In relation to litigation friends, despite there being no provision in the tribunal rules for litigation friends, the court decided that: "[T]here is ample flexibility in the tribunal rules to permit a tribunal to appoint a litigation friend in the rare circumstance that the child or incapacitated adult would not be able to represent him/herself and obtain effective access to justice without such a step being taken. In the alternative, even if the tribunal rules are not broad enough to confer that power, the overriding objective in the context of natural justice requires the same conclusion to be reached." |
Detail | Text | |
Subject | List of String, delimiter: , | Litigation friend cases • Repatriation cases |
Judicial_history | Wikitext | |
Judicial_history_first_page | Page | |
Date | Date | 2017-07-27 |
Judges | List of String, delimiter: , | Gross • Ernest Ryder • Underhill |
Parties | List of String, delimiter: , | AM (Afghanistan) • Secretary of State for the Home Department • Lord Chancellor |
Court | String | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
NCN | String | [2017] EWCA Civ 1123 |
MHLR | String | |
ICLR | String | [2017] WLR(D) 527 |
ICLR_ID | String | |
Essex | String | |
Essex_issue | String | |
Essex_page | String | |
Other_citations | List of String, delimiter: , | [2017] CP Rep 41 • [2017] Imm AR 6 • [2017] INLR 839 • [2018] 2 All ER 350 • [2017] Imm AR 1508 • [2018] 4 WLR 78 |
Cites | List of String, delimiter: # | |
External_links | Text | |
Judgment | File |
"News" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Which_table | String | Cases |
RSS_title | Wikitext | |
RSS_description | Wikitext | |
RSS_pubdate | Datetime | 2019-07-26 8:16:11 PM |