Page values for "AM (Afghanistan) v SSHD (2017) EWCA Civ 1123"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2019-07-26 8:29:51 PM
_modificationDateDatetime2023-07-04 11:32:00 PM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2017/07/27 |NCN=[2017] EWCA Civ 1123 |ICLR=[2017] WLR(D) 527 |Other citations=[2017] CP Rep 41, [2017] Imm AR 6, [2017] INLR 839, [2018] 2 All ER 350, [2017] Imm AR 1508, [2018] 4 WLR 78 |Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |Judges=Gross, Ernest Ryder, Underhill |Parties=AM (Afghanis ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |2017 cases Cases ICLR summary Judgment available on Bailii Litigation friend cases Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function Repatriation cases Judgment_available_on_Bailii 2017_cases
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringAM (Afghanistan) v SSHD (2017) EWCA Civ 1123
_pageIDInteger10,257
_pageNamePageAM (Afghanistan) v SSHD (2017) EWCA Civ 1123
_pageTitleString

AM (Afghanistan) v SSHD [2017] EWCA Civ 1123

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

Immigration tribunal - fair hearing, litigation friends

SummaryWikitext

In this judgment the Court of Appeal gave guidance on the general approach to be adopted in FTT and UT immigration and asylum cases to the fair determination of claims for asylum from children, young people and other incapacitated or vulnerable persons whose ability to effectively participate in proceedings may be limited. In relation to litigation friends, despite there being no provision in the tribunal rules for litigation friends, the court decided that: "[T]here is ample flexibility in the tribunal rules to permit a tribunal to appoint a litigation friend in the rare circumstance that the child or incapacitated adult would not be able to represent him/herself and obtain effective access to justice without such a step being taken. In the alternative, even if the tribunal rules are not broad enough to confer that power, the overriding objective in the context of natural justice requires the same conclusion to be reached."

DetailText
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,Litigation friend cases Repatriation cases
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2017-07-27
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,Gross Ernest Ryder Underhill
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,AM (Afghanistan) Secretary of State for the Home Department Lord Chancellor
CourtStringCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
NCNString[2017] EWCA Civ 1123
MHLRString
ICLRString[2017] WLR(D) 527
ICLR_IDString
EssexString
Essex_issueString
Essex_pageString
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,[2017] CP Rep 41 [2017] Imm AR 6 [2017] INLR 839 [2018] 2 All ER 350 [2017] Imm AR 1508 [2018] 4 WLR 78
CitesList of String, delimiter: #
External_linksText
JudgmentFile

"News" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
Which_tableStringCases
RSS_titleWikitext
RSS_descriptionWikitext
RSS_pubdateDatetime2019-07-26 8:16:11 PM