View source for Upper Tribunal case summary document (January 2016)

{{Resource
|Type=Document
|Title=Upper Tribunal case summary document
|Author=Hinchliffe, Mark
|Abstract=This is a document issued to tribunal judges as guidance. The summary of [[PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC)]] (in relation to the tribunal's role when faced with an ECHR breach) effectively rephrases as correct the position found to be unlawful by the Upper Tribunal (whose decision has since been overturned on appeal). The summary of [[WH v Partnerships in Care (2015) UKUT 695 (AAC), (2015) MHLO 132]] (in relation to the appropriate medical treatment test applying to the detaining hospital only) appears to contradict the ratio of the Upper Tribunal decision. See the case law pages for further details.
|Organisation=Mental Health Tribunal
|Date=January 2016
|Saved=Yes
|Download=UT cases January 2016.pdf
}}