View source for TA v AA (2013) EWCA Civ 1661, (2013) MHLO 120

''A Court of Protection circuit judge twice allowed the Official Solicitor to withdraw [[MCA 2005 s21A]] applications which the relevant person's representative (RPR) had made (the first time, the judge had also concluded that the qualifying requirements for DOLS were met). The RPR argued that by failing to determine the legality of AA's continued detention the judge had denied AA his [[Article 5]](4) rights. A High Court judge refused permission to appeal (appeals against circuit judges are made to nominated higher judges: the President of the Family Division, the Vice-Chancellor, or a puisne judge of the High Court). The RPR appealed to the Court of Appeal, which held that it had no jurisdiction to hear an appeal against refusal of permission such as this. Obiter: a full s21A hearing is not necessarily a lengthy, time consuming or expensive hearing.''

==Citations==
On Bailii as: TAQ v AA [2013] EWCA Civ 1661

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2013) EWCA Civ 1661}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]