View source for Storck v Germany 61603/00 (2005) ECHR 406

Breach of Arts 5, 8 for detention in private clinic. This case is taken as the source of the three-fold analysis of Article 5 deprivation of liberty, which was summarised in [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2014) UKSC 19]] as follows: "... what is the essential character of a deprivation of liberty? ... three components can be derived from Storck ..., confirmed in Stanev ..., as follows: (a) the objective component of confinement in a particular restricted place for a not negligible length of time; (b) the subjective component of lack of valid consent; and (c) the attribution of responsibility to the state."

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2005] ECHR 406}}

[[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]]
[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2005 cases]]