View source for Southend-on-Sea BC v AR (2012) EW Misc 25 (CC)

''The claimant local authority sought possession of an introductory tenancy on the basis of the defendant's antisocial behaviour. (1) The procedure was followed properly so there was no defence to the claim under the [[Housing Act 1996]]. (2) The original decision to seek possession was a necessary and proportionate interference with the defendant's [[Article 8]] rights: in particular, the diagnosis of Aspergers and depression (which led to lack of litigation capacity and appointment of a litigation friend) did not explain the defendant's conduct and was properly considered by the claimant. (3) However, there had been full compliance with the terms of the tenancy for the 12 months prior to the delayed final hearing, so possession was no longer proportionate. (4) No order for costs (despite the claimant seeking costs).''

==Related judgments==
[[Southend-on-Sea BC v Armour (2012) EWHC 3361 (QB), (2012) MHLO 152]]
*[[Southend-on-Sea BC v AR (2012) EW Misc 25 (CC)]]

==External links==
{{#bailii:[2012] EW Misc 25 (CC) }}

[2012] MHLO 151

[[Category:Miscellaneous cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]