View source for S v Estonia 17779/08 (2011) ECHR 1511

''Under domestic law S should have been heard 'promptly' after the county court ruled on her compulsory admission to hospital, but was not heard for 15 days; no adequate justification was given; this was a considerable portion of the three-month admission period; the domestic supreme court noted the procedural violation but offered no redress: overall, there had been a breach of [[Article 5]](1), in that she was not detained in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law. Compensation of €5000 was awarded.''

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2011) ECHR 1511}}

[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]