View source for SSWP v SS (DLA) (2010) UKUT 384 (AAC)

''The decision under challenge was stated to have been made unanimously when in fact it was made by majority. (1) There is no obligation on the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) to state whether a decision is made by a majority or is unanimous; however, any statement given must be accurate. (2) If the decision notice accurately records that the decision was by a majority then any statement of reasons must contain at least a brief statement of the reasons for the dissent of the minority member. (3) An inaccurate statement that a decision is unanimous amounts to an error of law. (4) The decision was therefore set aside and remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal for reconsideration.''

==Citations==
File no CDLA 892 2010

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2010) UKUT 384 (AAC)|no}}

[http://www.osscsc.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=3106 Transcript on Tribunals Service website]

[[Category:Upper Tribunal decisions]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]