View source for Romanov v Russia 63993/00 (2005) ECHR 933

''(1) Violation of [[Article 3]]: The applicant's conditions of detention, in particular the severe overcrowding and its detrimental effect on the applicant's well being, combined with the length of the period during which the applicant was detained in such conditions, amounted to degrading treatment. (2) Violation of [[Article 5]](3): the length of the proceedings (and detention on remand) was attributable neither to the complexity of the case nor to the conduct of the applicant but to the lack of diligence and expedition on the part of court. (3) Violation of [[Article 6]](1) and (3)(c): In view of what was at stake for the applicant the District Court could not, if the trial was to be fair, determine his case without a direct assessment of the applicant's evidence, and the presence of the applicant's lawyer could not compensate for his absence.''

==Related judgments==
[[Romanov v Russia 63993/00 (2005) ECHR 933]]

*[[Romanov v Russia 63993/00 (1998) ECHR 115]] (admissibility decision)

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2005] ECHR 933}}


[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2005 cases]]
<!--First category is subject area; Second is No summary/Brief summary/Detailed summary; Third is Transcript or No transcript; Fourth is YYYY cases-->