View source for Re Taylor (2012) MHLO 24 (EPA)

''(1) In Re Dunningham: The donor appointed two attorneys, A and B, to act jointly and severally.  She then imposed the following restriction: "and the said B shall have no authority to act on my behalf unless the said A has died or is incapable of acting as my Attorney".  On the application of the attorneys for severance, the court severed the restriction as being inconsistent with a joint and several appointment. (2) In Re Taylor: on similar facts, the court severed the words 'jointly and severally'.'' [OPG summaries - EPA cases.]

==Related judgments==
*[[Re Taylor (2012) MHLO 24 (EPA)]]
*[[Re Dunningham (2009) COP 15/9/09]]

==Note==
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.

'''Case title:''' Re Taylor (an order of District Judge Eldergill made on 7 December 2011)

'''Listed under heading:''' Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

{{epa-summary-link}}

[[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]]

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]