View source for Re Sawyer (2009) COP 31/3/09

''In Part B of the EPA the donor appointed four attorneys, but omitted to strike out either option "jointly" or "jointly and severally" in relation to how they should act.  On the application of the attorneys, the court was satisfied that the donor had intended to appoint them to act jointly and severally, and directed that the EPA should be construed as if they had been appointed jointly and severally and the alternative option "jointly" had been deleted.  The Public Guardian was directed to attach a note to that effect to the registered EPA.'' [OPG summary - EPA case.]

==Note==
The summary above is taken from the OPG website. It is listed under the heading "Rectification" as "Re Sawyer (an order made by District Judge S E Rogers on 31 March 2009)".

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

{{epa-summary-link}}

[[Category:EPA cases - formalities]]

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]