View source for Re SW (No 2) (2017) EWCOP 30

{{Case
|Date=2017/12/07
|NCN=[2017] EWCOP 30
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Munby
|Parties=SW
|Judicial history first case=Re SW (2017) EWCOP 7
|Sentence=Vexatious COP application
|Summary="This is another utterly misconceived application by a son (the son) in relation to his mother, SW. ... The son's application as it was presented to the District Judge was, in my judgment, totally without merit, misconceived and vexatious. His application under Rule 89 is equally devoid of merit. It must be dismissed, with the consequence that the District Judge's order striking out the original application remains in place."
|Subject=Other capacity cases
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2019/3/26 02:40:48 PM
}}


==Related judgments==
{{related judgments|}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2017) EWCOP 30}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2017 cases]]