View source for Re L: K v LBX (2016) EWHC 2607 (Fam)

{{Case
|Date=2016/07/26
|NCN=[2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)
|Other citations=[2016] MHLO 47
|Court=High Court (Family Division)
|Judges=Theis
|Parties=LBX, L, K
|Judicial history first case=LBX v K, L and M (2010) EWHC 2422 (COP)
|Sentence=Contact
|Summary="In essence, K says that this court should intervene because his son lacks capacity to be able to decide contact. More recently he has made an application to remove Miss O'Connell as a litigation friend for L. ... By the order I made on 15 November 2013, I found that L had capacity to decide about residence and care and I made orders under the inherent jurisdiction regulating what contact there should be between L and his father, as I considered him to be a vulnerable adult, he needed orders being made to ensure he retained his capacity... There is no evidence that L's capacity has changed."
|Subject=Inherent jurisdiction cases,Other capacity cases
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2023/07/27 10:46:24 PM
}}