View source for Re H (2012) MHLO 21 (LPA)

''The donor used the 2007 version of the LPA prescribed form and failed to tick the box to confirm that she had read (or had read to her) the prescribed information on pages 2, 3 and 4. On the attorney's application the court was unable to find on balance of probability that the donor had read (or had read to her) the prescribed information. This was a failure of execution and the court had no discretion to uphold it. '' [OPG summary - LPA case.]

==Note==
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.

'''Case title:''' Re H (an order of District Judge Ralton made on 24 January 2012)

'''Listed under heading:''' Whether the instrument has been correctly executed

==External link==
{{#bailii:no ncn}}

{{lpa-summary-link}}

[[Media:Re H (2012) MHLO 21 (LPA).pdf|Transcript]]


[[Category:LPA cases - formalities]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]