View source for Re Darlison (2012) MHLO 91 (LPA)

''The donor made an LPA for property and financial affairs.  In the guidance section she stated: "Oversee X's financial welfare.  X is [my] daughter."  On the application of the Public Guardian the guidance was severed on the ground that the donor of an LPA cannot authorise the attorneys to act in relation to the financial affairs of another person.'' [OPG summary - LPA case.]

==Note==
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.

'''Case title:''' Re Darlison (an order of the Senior Judge made on 9 July 2012)

'''Listed under heading:''' Severance of restrictions incompatible with an LPA

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

{{lpa-summary-link}}


[[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]