View source for Re Bratt (2009) COP 14/4/09

''The donor appointed two attorneys, A and B, to act jointly and severally, and directed that "B is only to act as attorney in the event of A being physically or mentally incapable of acting in this capacity".  On the application of the Public Guardian this provision was severed as being inconsistent with a joint and several appointment.  The Senior Judge added that, to have achieved the desired objective, the donor should instead have appointed B to be a replacement attorney.'' (OPG summary.)

==Note==
The summary above is taken from the OPG website. It is listed under the heading "Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment" as "Re Bratt (an order made by the Senior Judge on 14 September 2009)".

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

[http://www.publicguardian.gov.uk/forms/cop-lpa-orders.htm Summary on OPG website]


[[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]]

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]