View source for Re AH: AH v Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWCOP 276

{{Case
|Date=2011-02-17
|NCN=[2011] EWCOP 276
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Peter Jackson
|Parties=AH, Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Ealing PCT
|Judicial history=*[[Re AH (Costs) (2011) EWCOP 3524]]
*[[Re AH: AH v Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWCOP 276]]
|Sentence=Residence
|Summary=(1) The case concerned the proposal to move 12 adults from a specialist residential service (SRS) to alternative homes, and this judgment is a 'firm provisional decision' on one case in the hope of assisting resolution of all cases. (2) It was clearly not in AH's best interests to be moved: only the closure of SRS could justify the turmoil of a move. (3) This case illustrates the point that guideline policies (here, the campus closure programme) cannot be treated as universal solutions.
|Detail===Citations==
AH (by his litigation friend RH) v (1) Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2) Ealing Primary Care Trust

Case No: COP11868544

==Thanks==
{{thanks|Ruck Keene, Alex|39 Essex Chambers}}
|Subject=Best interests
|Judgment=Re AH; AH v Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWHC 276 (COP).doc
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2024-10-26 10:33:48 PM
}}