View source for Re ADE (Scope of Schedule A1) (2010) COP 11821802

''Given that a standard authorisation extends to restraining a person from leaving the accommodation, it must also extend to compelling him to return: "Do the powers under the existing standard authorisation extend to coercing ADE back to the nursing home if ADE refuses to return?  It would be little short of absurd if the local authority and AHNH had powers to restrain him from leaving but not to compel him to return: the greater power must include the lesser.  I will therefore declare that this power is implicit in the current and any future standard authorisation." ''

==Note of judgment==
See below for printable PDF version.

{{Text|Note of Re ADE (Scope of Schedule A1) (2010) COP 30/6/10}}

==Summary of judgment==
The following is an extract from 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter', issue 4, December 2010 (link below).

{{Text|Essex Chambers summary of Re P (Scope of Schedule A1) (2010) COP 30/6/10}}

==Citations==
ADE v XCC and AHNH

Originally on MHLO as "Re P"

Case no 11821802

==External link==
{{#bailii:no ncn}}

[[Media:CoP newsletter December 2010.pdf|39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter', issue 4, December 2010]]

[[Media:Re ADE (Scope of Schedule A1) (2010) COP 30-6-10.pdf|Note of judgment]]

[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]