View source for R v Shulman (2010) EWCA Crim 1034

''(1) For the convictions the court substituted findings that the appellant was under a disability at the time of trial, namely he was unfit to plead, and that he did the acts charged against him. (2) In respect of each count a restricted hospital order was imposed, in place of the prison sentences.''

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2010) EWCA Crim 1034|no}}

{{judgment available offline}} (MHLR)

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]
[[Category:Unfitness and insanity cases]]