View source for R v Shah (2011) EWCA Crim 2333

''Following a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, a restricted hospital order was imposed; an appeal, relying on post-sentence medical evidence, was made against the restriction order. (1) In exceptional cases the court can consider good progress after sentencing, but in this case the task was to decide whether, on the material before him on the date of sentence, the judge's sentence was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive: it was not. (2) The sentence provides a mechanism for release by a Tribunal from the restriction order and the full rigour therefore of the hospital order [this is incorrect], so the appeal court should not taken over the function of that body.''

==Transcript==
{{Text:Transcript of R v Shah (2011) EWCA Crim 2333}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2011) EWCA Crim 2333}}
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]
[[Category:Restriction order cases]]