View source for R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 2473

''On appeal, the restriction order was quashed: the judge had applied the correct test (whether it was necessary to protect the public from serious harm) but, as confirmed by a psychiatric report prepared for the appeal, he had got the answer wrong.'' [Summary based on All ER (D) report.]

==Related judgments==
[[R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 2473]]
*[[R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 1456]]

==Other==
Date: 20/10/11

Before: Hughes LJ, Cranston and Hickinbottom JJ (judgment delivered extempore)

John Lockhurst (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. 

Henry Hughes (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.

==Citations==
R v G'''r'''oucher (2011) All ER (D) 164 (Oct)

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2011) EWCA Crim 2473|no}}

[[Media:R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 2473.pdf|Transcript]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]
[[Category:Restriction order cases]]