View source for R v Fort (2013) EWCA Crim 2332, (2013) MHLO 111

''(1) The sentencing judge erred in concluding that the appellant would continue to pose a significant risk of serious harm to members of the public occasioned by the commission of serious offences, even if his mental disorder were to be cured or substantially alleviated, and therefore erred in imposing a sentence of custody for life as opposed to a [[s37/41]] hospital order. (2) The judge's order under [[s45A]] was unlawful, because such an order could not be made on someone who was under 21 at the time of conviction (and was thus being considered for a sentence of custody for life, as opposed to a sentence of imprisonment, as would be the case on a person over 21 at the date of conviction). ''

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2013] EWCA Crim 2332}}

[[Category:Life sentence cases]]
[[Category:Hybrid order cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]